Movie Analysis – Wall Street (1987)

Stone, like many film-makers in America, resorts not only to creating a stereotypical character to stand in Wall Street as the microcosmic representation of an ambitious and young woman, but he uses that "cardboard" character to forward traditional misogynistic perceptions of women. This aspect of the social microcosm comprised by the minor characters of the movie is, itself, enough to rob the film of any serious claim to universality. Instead of representing the vast real-life experiences of women in America during the 1980's, Wall Street offers a cardboard figure of a "femme fatale" one whose weapons are sex and money and one whose rejection means the simultaneous embrace of "moral character." Far from finding a universal expression for a cultural consciousness of note in American society, Stone merely followed other "Hollywood filmmakers[who] returned to the moralistic version of the success myth, which had seemed to have been superseded" (Traube 1992, 121) and where this moralism is conveyed in Stone's Wall Street, there is an implied "appeal in their various ways to fears of moral breakdown, and they assert the need for moral restraint" (Traube 1992, 121). For Stone, in Wall Street, part of this "restraint" has to do with the implied rejection of women's ambition and women's sexuality and continues a traditional mind-set, beginning as far back as "Adam and Eve" of blaming women for the faults men discover in themselves.

Movie Analysis – Wall Street (1987)

Movie Analysis – Wall Street (1987)

Movie Analysis – Wall Street (1987)

In fact, not only did Stone view this attitude as prominent in America, the movie suggests that Stone saw this attitude as nearly ubiquitous in American culture. As critical opinion typically holds, Stone's film is an exploration of how "1980s America became seduced by fast money and a slippery-slope morality" (Mackey-Kallis 1996, 124) and, as such, the film stands as a moralistic narrative: " Now is the time to wake up, the film screams, and realize what we have done. Wall Street is our cleansing, our rite of passage" (Mackey-Kallis 1996, 124). The implication is that Stone has fashioned a sort of 1980's "modern fable" in order to deal with a deeply consequential theme in American society which, itself, represented an almost universal struggle for all Americans.

Movie Analysis – Wall Street (1987)

Somewhere toward the middle of ''Wall Street,'' Gekko takes the microphone at the annual meeting of Teldar Paper, a company he's seeking to acquire, to deliver a pep talk on greed that - briefly - electrifies the movie. He sounds like Gore Vidal jazzing up the pages of The New York Review of Books.

a. What are the ethical and legal issues depicted in the movie, Wall Street?
Please answer two question bellow from the Wall Street Movie from 1987

Movie Analysis – Wall Street (1987) - EssaysLink by …

Seeing this movie, I feel kind of ripped off knowing going in that Gordon Gecko was the villain. I think figuring that out for myself might have been a pleasure unto itself, but I can't get too angry. This movie on the whole is engaging from beginning to end, and despite its running time, I was never bored. I think it IS a little too long though. Apart from that, I can find few complaints. It's a great Paradise Lost-type story of the seduction, corruption and redemption of a young man, all placed within 1988 Wall Street. Ingenious, really, in the way it places the story in a very timely and specific spot, but plays as well now as ever it did. I don't think I've ever seen a villain as slimy, slick, glib, gleeful and playful as Gordon Gekko. I don't think he ever actually calls his protege by his name; it's always "Buddy" or "Sport" or "Pal", making the dissonance between his chumminess and his callousness even more jarring. He's fascinating; motivated by an arbitrary goal to do callous things for his own... amusement? He loves his job, and though he'll tell you that he's all about the Benjamins, I think he's really all about the power. I wonder if he'd do what he does even if he weren't getting paid. Douglas deserved his award, without question. I also loved the juxtaposition between Gekko and Carl Fox, Bud's father. It must be seen to be believed.

Christian Bale stars in this 2000 movie about a Wall Street professional becoming increasingly insane.

Wall Street (1987) - Rotten Tomatoes - Movie Trailers

I mainly purchased the DVD, because of two reasons: Michael Douglas and Charlie Sheen. I'm quite an admirer of both actors. I have virtually no knowledge about the stock market, or about stocks themselves. Those who are in the market or have vast knowledge about stocks will probably enjoy the film much more. However, I still enjoyed the film. When a movie's really good, it doesn't matter whether or not the audience member is interested in the topic. Besides, the film boils down to basic universal themes, like selling your soul to the devil and money being the root of all evil.

The characters are interesting and richly developed, with the exception of Darryl Hannah's underwritten character. I can see why she didn't like playing that role. Douglas is always a joy to watch, and makes a suave yet slimy villain. I wouldn't necessarily say he deserved an Oscar, but he did a fine job nonetheless. So did Charlie Sheen, who is actually the star of the film despite the fact that most people remember "Wall Street" for Douglas as Gordon Gecko. Sheen gives a fine multi-dimensional performance. I love the scenes between him and his father Martin Sheen, who plays his father in the film. Oliver Stone made a great choice casting the father-and-son team, since the tension in their scenes feels very authentic.

There are some predictable plot turns and character arcs, but altogether Stone keeps the excitement going. I like how the climactic scene between Douglas and Sheen is shot without cuts, with the camera moving from person to person, keeping the tension going. If I knew at least an inkling about the stock market, I wouldn't be completely lost during certain scenes, but what can you do? I still think it's a fine film with solid performances.

My score: 7 (out of 10)

Ünlü Hollywood film yönetmenlerinden Oliver Stone un, 1987 de çektiği "Wall Street" filmin

FREE Wall Street Movie Essay - Example Essays

One April evening in 1973—at the height of the flood—a fisherman walked onto the structure. There is, after all, order in the universe, and some things take precedence over impending disasters. On the inflow side, facing the Mississippi, the structure was bracketed by a pair of guide walls that reached out like curving arms to bring in the water. Close by the guide wall at the south end was the swirling eddy, which by now had become a whirlpool. There was other motion as well—or so it seemed. The fisherman went to find Dugas, in his command post at the north end of the structure, and told him the guide wall had moved. Dugie told the fisherman he was seeing things. The fisherman nodded affirmatively.