Film Critique for the Movie Titanic - by Lowery19
Essay about Movie Review of Titanic - 1096 Words
The film was released less than six months after , where the director made comments to police after being stopped on suspicion of ; the incident garnered Gibson much negative publicity and magnified concerns some had over alleged antisemitism in his previous film, . Several key film critics alluded to the incident in their reviews of : In his positive review, commented: "say what you will about him – about his problem with booze or his problem with Jews – he is a serious filmmaker." The review came to a similar conclusion, noting that "Gibson may be a lunatic, but he's our lunatic, and while I wouldn't wish him behind the wheel of a car after happy hour or at a function anytime, behind a camera is another matter." In a negative review, noted "People are curious about this movie because of what might be called extra-textual reasons, because its director is an erratic and charismatic Hollywood figure who would have totally marginalized himself by now if he didn't possess a crude gift for crafting violent pop entertainment."
Titanic Movie Review Essay - 1630 Words - StudyMode
In 1994, The Wachowskis presented the script for the film to . After , the president of production of the company at the time, read the script, he decided to buy rights to it and included two more pictures, and , in the contract. The first movie The Wachowskis directed, , then became a critical success. Using this momentum, the siblings later asked to direct .
even some of the most successful ones being one of them. It was one of the most unique movies in cinema history because it was one of the most hated/beloved movies ever made. What’s so special about is that although the movie critics panned saying it was one of the worst movies...Other scholars of Mesoamerican history criticized the film for what they said were numerous inaccuracies. See further coverage on the film's questionable historical accuracy and representation of the Maya below under "". Numerous scholars have also risen to defend the film citing ignorance or political correctness as the primary motivator for the criticisms. A recent essay by Hansen on the film and a critical commentary on the criticisms of the film is now published.